Global NCAP wants ban on Nissan NP300 in Africa

Global NCAP test result for the Nissan NP300 Hardbody was not good

Global NCAP test result for the Nissan NP300 'Hardbody' was not good

The latest crash test results in the #SaferCarsForAfrica campaign, released by Global NCAP and AA South Africa last week, show that Nissan's NP300 'Hardbody' received a zero star safety rating. Global NCAP said the vehicle structure collapsed and was found to be unstable during the test. Moreover, the 'high forces placed on the crash test driver dummy pose a significant risk of fatal injury'. The NP300's bodyshell was so unstable that the airbags were ineffective, Global NCAP said.
Global NCAP secretary general, David Ward, and AA South Africa CEO, Collins Khumalo, have now written to the UN Economic Commission for Africa and the African Development Bank, calling for urgent action by African governments to prevent the sale of zero star cars like the Nissan NP300.
David Ward, Global NCAP secretary general said: "The zero star result of the NP300 is particularly troubling as the car is fitted with dual airbags and this might encourage consumers to believe that the car has a good level of safety. Indeed, Nissan misleadingly claims that the car occupants are protected by a so-called 'Safety Shield' and its 'Hardbody' label also conveys an image of strength. However, in our crash test, the car's bodyshell collapsed and neither the steering column nor the airbags acted as they should to minimise risk of injury.
"In our view remedial action to strengthen the NP300's bodyshell is now urgently needed. This is a concern not just in South Africa but elsewhere as Nissan has plans to increase exports of this vehicle across Africa.

"We believe action should be taken now to prevent the sale of zero star cars like the Nissan NP300 anywhere in Africa."
Collins Khumalo, CEO of the AA of South Africa said: "These results are outrageous and show unsafe vehicles are being sold to the people of Africa, which no manufacturer would consider selling in other markets. Aiming to meet or exceed minimum standards is not the same as making vehicles with acceptable safety standards, and manufacturers know this. These standards must change, and we need urgent intervention from policy makers to make this happen."
Nissan NP300 'Hardbody'

Global NCAP said the NP300 'Hardbody' achieved an 'alarming zero star rating for its poor adult occupant protection mainly in the driver head and chest areas in the frontal crash test at 64km/h'. It also said the vehicle structure collapsed during the crash test and it was rated as unstable. The steering wheel column did not collapse penetrating the passenger compartment, creating an additional risk for the driver as it moved straight into the dummy chest.
This performance showed a significant risk of injuries for the driver despite the car being equipped with double frontal airbags.
The high probability of life threatening injuries to the driver's head and chest resulted in the zero star adult occupant protection rating. Even with an airbag the driver's head and chest showed high biomechanical readings.
The NP300 'Hardbody' achieved two stars for child occupant protection; the low result is mainly explained by the decision of the car manufacturer to install one of the child seats without following child seat manufacturer clear instructions, Global NCAP said.

A copy of the full Nissan NP300 crash test report can be read by following this link:

Auto market intelligence
from just-auto

• Auto component fitment forecasts
• OEM & tier 1 profiles & factory finder
• Analysis of 30+ auto technologies & more

Read Full Article Here

Related posts

Leave a Comment